Interface365
Live walkthrough · Manufacturing

From engineer referral to PO release — in one CRM.

Follow Cascade Industrial Systems as they take a single engineer referral and run it end-to-end through Interface365 — technical discovery, plant visit, application engineering, a phased-delivery negotiation that saves the deal, PO + down payment, production release, post-commissioning expansion order. RFQ pipeline + active production tracking — both live, both linked, no spreadsheets.

15 steps
~13 min read
Single account — RFQ → PO release

The manufacturer

CI
Cascade Industrial Systems
Stainless-steel processing equipment · 120 staff · Portland, OR
32 yrs in business · ~$42M annual revenue · Mixers / kettles / heat exchangers / CIP-ready piping for food & beverage, pharma, personal-care · ERP: Epicor Kinetic. Direct in NA, reps in EU/Asia.

The customer

AB
Aurelia Beverages
Functional non-alcoholic drinks · 35 staff · San Diego, CA
Series-B funded · scaling production 50K → 300K cases/month · need new high-throughput batch-mixing system + integration with existing bottling line · referred via Carlos Reyes' (Lead Process Engineer) ex-colleague at Park Process Engineering · ~$1.4M deal envelope
01
Step 1

RFQ inbound capture

Carlos Reyes — Lead Process Engineer at Aurelia Beverages, tipped off by his ex-colleague at Park Process Engineering — submits the "Get a quote" form on cascadeindustrial.com. Interface365 captures the RFQ with full source attribution to the engineer referral. The form gathers process type, throughput, sanitary spec, target commissioning date, and referral source so the AE can show up to the discovery call prepared.

Why this matters →RFQ submissions auto-capture with referral attribution, route to a territory owner, and never live in someone's inbox.
Get a quote
Carlos Reyes
Aurelia Beverages
carlos.reyes@aureliabev.com
+1 (619) 555-0241
Scaling 50K → 300K cases/mo · need new batch mixing line · ~1500 gal primary
Q3 2026
Engineer / consultant referral
Submit RFQ
CR
Carlos Reyes — Aurelia Beverages
Lead
SourceEngineer / consultant referral
Lead score60 / 100
Rating● Hot
OwnerDavid Yoon
CreatedJan 12, 2026 · 11:42
Status
New · RFQ inbound
How it gets there: The website form posts to Interface365's webhook endpoint with the RFQ payload. The matching Source ("Engineer / consultant referral") is configured under Settings → Sources, so attribution is automatic — and the referring consultancy is tagged on the lead immediately so reciprocity tracking starts on Day 1. RFQs route by territory: Western US f&b inquiries land on David Yoon (Senior AE).
02
Step 2

Qualification call & lead enrichment

David calls Carlos within two hours, runs a 30-minute discovery, and enriches the lead record with custom fields. The lead status flows New → Contacted → Qualified.

Why this matters →One call, six custom fields filled, status flipped — the record is now pipeline-ready without any retyping at the application-engineering hand-off.
Lead status progression
New → Contacted → ● Qualified
Activity logged
RFQ qualification call · 30 min · David Yoon
David called Carlos at 14:10 the same afternoon. Discovery: batch process (not continuous), product viscosity 200-1200 cP, 3-A dairy + non-dairy sanitary spec, target throughput 300K cases/mo, expanding SKU range from 3 → 12 over 18 months. Current bottleneck: existing 300-gal mixer caps at 60K cases/mo. Series-B closed Q1 2026 ($48M). Existing bottling line is Krones (will need integration in a Phase 2). Carlos mentioned his ex-colleague at Park Process Engineering (Seattle) tipped him off — David captured Park Process as the source organization on the lead. Decision team forming: Maya Chen (VP Ops) signs, Carlos drives technical, Priya Shah (CFO) signs the cheque. Booked a plant visit with David + Linda Pham (App Engineer) for Jan 21. Auto-task fired for Linda to begin application sizing.
Lead score: 60 → 88 / 100 post-call (+28). Funding stage, sanitary spec, decision-team formed, source organization identified all bumped the score above the auto-conversion threshold of 80.
Custom fields (Lead)
Process type
Batch · 1500 gal primary
Throughput target
300K cases / mo (5×)
Sanitary standard
3-A + EHEDG
Deal envelope (est.)
~$1.2M – $1.5M
Commissioning target
Q3 2026
Funding stage
✓ Series-B (Q1 2026)
03
Step 3

Lead conversion — one click, three entities

With the lead qualified and Linda starting application sizing, David clicks Convert. Interface365 creates a Contact + Account + Source organization + Deal all linked, all linked. Lead score climbs from 60 → 88 post-call.

Why this matters →One click creates Contact + Account + Source organization + Deal, all linked. No retyping, no orphaned records — and the referrer's company stays a separate entity for relationship tracking.
CR
Carlos Reyes — Lead
Status: Converted
Converts to
CR
Carlos Reyes
Contact
TitleLead Process Engineer
Emailcarlos.reyes@aureliabev.com
TypePotential Customer · Technical
PP
Park Process Engineering
Source organization
TypeProcess Engineering Consultancy
HQSeattle, WA
Websiteparkprocess.com
RelationshipReferrer · 4th tip this yr
Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line — 1500 gal
Deal
Estimate (envelope)$1.2M
PipelineCapital Equipment Sales
StageDiscovery
StatusOpen
One transaction, atomic. Either every entity is created, or none. The lead's notes, activities, and files are reassigned to the new contact/account/deal automatically — nothing is lost. The Aurelia Account is created as the customer; Park Process Engineering stays a separate Source Organization for referral attribution and future co-sells.
04
Step 4

Buying committee — stakeholders, custom fields, tags

Capital-equipment sales always have a buying committee — VP Ops who sponsors the project, technical buyer who specs the equipment, CFO who signs the cheque, plant manager who lives with it. David adds Maya, Priya, and Tom to the deal with explicit roles.

Why this matters →Multi-contact deals with explicit roles model the real buying committee natively — not as comma-lists in a notes field.
Buying committee — 4 stakeholders on this deal
MC
Maya Chen
VP Operations · maya.chen@aureliabev.com
Decision Maker · Economic Buyer
CR
Carlos Reyes
Lead Process Engineer · carlos.reyes@aureliabev.com
Champion · Technical Buyer
PS
Priya Shah
CFO · priya.shah@aureliabev.com
Influencer · Financial Authority
TB
Tom Bauer
Plant Manager · tom.bauer@aureliabev.com
Influencer · End User
Custom fields (Deal)
Plant location
San Diego, CA
Site capacity expansion
5× (50K → 300K cases/mo)
Funding stage
Series-B closed Q1 ($48M)
Existing equipment vendor
Krones (bottling line)
Sanitary standard
3-A + EHEDG
App engineer
Linda Pham
Tags & visibility
Tags
Series-B F&B Batch Engineer-referred Phased-deal-likely
Visibility
Deal team — AE + App Engineer
Owner & expected close
Owner: David Yoon
Expected PO release: Mar 12, 2026 (~60 days)
05
Step 5

Plant visit, notes & files — the full deal context

Over the next two weeks, David and Linda log every interaction. The half-day plant visit, utility photos, P&ID drawings from Carlos, hand-sketched tie-in concept, Park Process's original RFP, and internal margin commentary all live on the deal record — nothing in side-channel emails or random Drive folders.

Why this matters →Every interaction, drawing, and decision lives on the deal — not scattered across email, text threads, and shared drives.
Activity timeline
Plant visit — Aurelia, San Diego· Jan 21 · 4 hrs · David + Linda
Flew in for a half-day on-site. Walked the existing line with Tom Bauer + Carlos. Captured: floor layout PDF, 12 utility tie-in photos, Carlos's existing P&ID drawings, and Park Process's original process flow spec (Carlos shared it). Linda's hand-sketched tie-in concept photographed and uploaded. Ceiling clearance 14'-2" fits the 1500-gal vertical; CIP loop tie-in possible at the existing 4" header; need a new 480V 3-ph 200A drop. Tom is sceptical of CIP automation — wants manual override. Logged for design.
Referral thank-you to Park Process· Jan 23 · sent
David sent a personal thank-you + an industry-conference dinner invite to Park Process's principal engineer for the tip. Park Process tagged as Referrer for reciprocity tracking — 4th tip this year from their team, total deal volume influenced ~$4.7M.
Reference call — Northwest Brewing Co.· Jan 28 · David + Maya + Carlos
Set up a 45-min reference call between Aurelia (Maya, Carlos) and a similar-scale Cascade customer (Northwest Brewing — 200K cases/mo, installed a 1200-gal mixer + bottling integration in 2024). Northwest's plant manager confirmed: lead-times tracked, FAT/SAT clean, support post-commissioning was strong. Maya texted David afterward: "Helpful. We're moving forward."
Technical proposal sent — $1.52M· Feb 6
Linda finalised the 14-line BOM ($1.52M consolidated 36-week delivery) and emailed Maya + Carlos + cc'd Priya. Cover page + scope-of-supply + BOM + payment milestones + assumptions/exclusions + lead-time table + ROI summary attached. Stage moved to Technical Proposal. Maya opened it 41 minutes later. Quiet for two days.
Internal notes
D David Yoon
Jan 21
Maya is technically literate (her engineering background shows). Carlos is the deepest technical voice; he'll spec what we build. Priya hasn't been in any conversation yet — that's the lever to watch. Tom Bauer's "manual CIP override" comment is a tell — design must respect it or we'll lose his vote. They're locked on the Q3 commissioning target — anything that threatens it becomes a deal-breaker conversation. Series-B runway is real, not aspirational; the cap-ex committee is meeting in four weeks.
L Linda Pham
Feb 4
Sizing complete. Vendor quotes back on the 600-gal kettles + heat-exchanger skid. Total estimated cost basis: $1.04M direct + $312K OH&P + escalation = $1.52M consolidated with a 36-week fab lead time (mixer dictates). That's a very long calendar for a Series-B-pace ramp. Flagging to David: phased delivery (Phase 1 mixer/kettles/HX/controls @ $0.92M / 14 weeks fab, Phase 2 bottling tie-in/CIP @ $0.48M / 22 weeks fab) is technically achievable and gets the plant production-ready ~week 19 (FAT week 14 + ship + SAT + commissioning ≈ +5 wks). Total $1.40M. Worth raising before they push back on lead-time.
D David Yoon
Feb 6
Sending the $1.52M consolidated proposal as-spec — but pre-loading the phased option in the appendix. Don't lead with phasing; lead with the right system. If they accept $1.52M / 36 weeks, full margin holds. If lead-time pushback arrives (and it will — Series-B), the phased option becomes the pivot — that's where this deal closes. Greg is briefed; he'll sign anything over $1M.
Files attached (4 of 12)
aurelia-pid-existing-rev2.pdf 6.8 MB · Jan 21 · Carlos Reyes
aurelia-utility-photos-jan21.zip 38 MB · Jan 21 · David Y.
park-process-rfp-process-flow.xlsx 240 KB · Jan 21 · Carlos R.
aurelia-tech-proposal-v1.pdf 2.4 MB · Feb 6 · Linda P.
06
Step 6

Tasks & follow-ups — never let a thread drop

Tasks attach to the deal with priority, due dates, and assignees. Polymorphic — they can also attach to contacts, accounts, or projects. Capital-equipment cycles are long; tasks are how the deal stays alive between touches.

Why this matters →Polymorphic tasks (deal / contact / account / project) with priority + due-date — follow-ups stop slipping.
Tasks for this deal
Send NDA + technical-package draft Jan 16 · David Y.
Plant visit — San Diego (David + Linda) Jan 21 · David Y.
Send referral thank-you to Park Process Jan 23 · David Y.
Submit vendor quotes (kettles + heat-exchanger sub-skid) Jan 28 · David Y.
Reference call — Northwest Brewing Co. Jan 28 · David Y.
Complete application sizing (1500 gal + ancillaries) Jan 30 · Linda P.
ROI / TCO analysis for Maya + Priya Feb 4 · Linda P.
Day-5 follow-up call after technical proposal sent Feb 11 · David Y.
Schedule phased-delivery review with Maya + Priya Feb 13 · David Y.
Issue revised proposal v2 (phased option) after review Feb 18 · Linda P.
9 task types · 4 priority levels · 5 statuses. Tasks support: To Do, Phone Call, Email, Meeting, Follow Up, Demo, Proposal, Deadline, Other. Priority: Low / Medium / High / Urgent. Status: Pending / In Progress / Completed / Cancelled / Deferred.
07
Step 7

Pipeline progression & stagnant alerts

As the deal advances, David drags it through stages on the 8-stage Capital Equipment Sales pipeline. If application engineering goes quiet for 14+ days post-Discovery (or 7+ days post-Technical Proposal), Interface365 flags it as stagnant and surfaces it on the dashboard. In capital equipment, a forgotten technical proposal isn't lost time — it's a competitor closing.

Why this matters →Drag-drop stages with weighted forecast, plus stagnant alerts that flag idle proposals before competitors close them.
✓ RFQ Received
5%
✓ Qualified
15%
✓ Discovery
25%
✓ Application Engineering
40%
● Technical Proposal
60%
Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line
Deal · in Technical Proposal
Proposal value$1,520,000
Probability60%
Weighted forecast$912,000
Days in stage5 days (approaching stall window)
Last activity5 days ago (proposal sent)
Target POMar 12, 2026 (cap-ex committee in 2 wks)
Stagnant deals (last activity 14d+)
Sterling Foods — CIP Skid + Tanks
$420K · Application Engineering · 17d idle
Veridian Personal Care — Lotion Line
$2.1M · Negotiation · 15d idle
Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1
$1.52M · Technical Proposal · 5d idle
Forecasting math: Weighted forecast = proposal value × stage probability. $1.52M × 60% = $912,000 weighted. As the deal advances Technical Proposal → Negotiation → PO Pending → Closed Won, the weight tightens — and so does the firm's quarterly production-capacity allocation, long-lead casting orders, and Greg's executive forecast roll-up.
08
Step 8

Equipment catalogue — SKUs, lead-times, sanitary specs

Cascade's catalogue — 240 SKUs across 8 product families (mixers / kettles / heat-exchanger skids / CIP skids / control panels / instrumentation / stainless piping / installation labour). Each item carries base price, lead-time weeks, sanitary spec compliance flags (3-A / EHEDG / FDA), and CAD drawing URL. Lifecycle states (Active / Draft / Discontinued) keep last quarter's casting prices off a new proposal.

Why this matters →A versioned catalogue with lifecycle states + sanitary spec flags — Linda assembles the BOM from a single source of truth, not a spreadsheet someone rebuilds every quarter.
Active
1500-gal jacketed mixer (low-shear)
CSM-1500-JKT
Mixers · 3-A + EHEDG · 14 wks
$362,000 base · top-mount drive
Active
600-gal kettle — sanitary
CSM-600-KETTLE
Kettles · 3-A + EHEDG · 11 wks
$84,500 each · jacketed, dimpled
Active
Heat-exchanger skid — 300 kW
CSM-HX-300
HX skids · 3-A · 10 wks
$118,000 / skid · plate-and-frame
Active
Control panel — Allen-Bradley CompactLogix
PLC-AB-CL
Controls · UL 508A · 8 wks
$58,400 / panel · 16-pt I/O
Active
Stainless piping (304L sanitary)
PIPE-304L-SAN
Piping · 3-A · 4 wks
$185 / linear ft installed
Active
Commissioning labour — controls engineer
LBR-CTL-CMS
Installation labour
$210 / hour · on-site
Draft
CIP skid — automated, 2-tank
CSM-CIP-AUTO-2T
CIP · 3-A · TBD
$94,200 / skid · pending vendor re-quote
Casting supplier shifted Q1 · don't use on new proposals yet
Discontinued
1200-gal jacketed mixer (high-shear)
CSM-1200-HS
Mixers · superseded
$298,000 base
Superseded by CSM-1500-JKT (better turn-down ratio) · spares stock 24 mo
09
Step 9

Technical proposal — BOM, payment milestones, lead-times, ROI

Linda assembles the 14-line BOM picking + configuring catalogue items. Pricing is snapshotted at the moment of proposal-send — vendor casting price changes won't retroactively touch Aurelia's number. The proposal ships with cover page + scope-of-supply + payment milestones (20/30/30/20) + assumptions + exclusions + lead-time table + ROI summary.

Why this matters →Capital-equipment proposals are BOM-driven by configurable SKU. Snapshot pricing, transparent assumptions + exclusions, single source of truth for the inevitable change-order conversations.
PROP-2026-0341
Issued: Feb 6, 2026
Valid until: Apr 7, 2026 (60 days)
Deal: Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line — 1500 gal
For: Maya Chen, VP Operations · Aurelia Beverages
App engineer: Linda Pham · AE: David Yoon
Sent
# Scope of supply Qty Unit price Lead Extended
1 1500-gal jacketed mixer (low-shear)
CSM-1500-JKT · top-mount drive · 3-A + EHEDG · CIP-ready · stainless 316L wetted
1 $362,000 14 wk $362,000
2 600-gal sanitary kettle (jacketed)
CSM-600-KETTLE · dimpled jacket · agitator · 3-A + EHEDG
3 $84,500 11 wk $253,500
3 Heat-exchanger skid — 300 kW
CSM-HX-300 · plate-and-frame · CIP-ready · stainless frame
1 $118,000 10 wk $118,000
4 Control panel + PLC (Allen-Bradley CompactLogix)
PLC-AB-CL · 16-pt I/O · UL 508A · HMI 12" · with Tom's manual CIP override switches
1 $58,400 8 wk $58,400
5 Instrumentation package
Temp / pressure / level / flow sensors · sanitary fittings · with calibration certs
lot $42,200 8 wk $42,200
6 Stainless piping & fittings (304L sanitary)
PIPE-304L-SAN · ~210 lin-ft · 2"–4" diameter · welded + clamped joints · documented welds
210 lf $185 4 wk $38,850
7 — Phase 2: Bottling-line tie-in (Krones)
Sanitary pipe runs · valve manifolds · transfer pump skid · controls integration
lot $248,000 22 wk $248,000
8 — Phase 2: Flavour-injection skid
Mass-flow controlled injection · 4-recipe library · sanitary CIP path
1 $94,500 14 wk $94,500
9 — Phase 2: Secondary CIP loop
2-tank automated CIP · 5-step recipe support · pre-rinse / caustic / rinse / acid / final-rinse
1 $112,400 12 wk $112,400
10 Engineering, project management, documentation
Linda Pham (App Engineer, lead) · 320 hrs · 3-A & EHEDG compliance docs · O&M manuals · weld logs
320 hr $165 incl. $52,800
11 Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) — Cascade Portland
3-day on-site at Cascade · IQ/OQ/PQ pre-cut · Aurelia witnesses · sign-off triggers shipment
lump $28,000 1 wk $28,000
12 Site Acceptance Test (SAT) + commissioning
2 controls engineers + 1 mech engineer · 5-day on-site · operator training · production-release sign-off
120 hr $210 2 wk $25,200
13 Freight, rigging, spares package
Truck shipment Portland → San Diego · rigging crew · 1-yr critical-spares kit
lump $36,400 incl. $36,400
14 Pre-fabrication site survey + RFQ admin
No fee — included as part of proposal terms
1 $0 — $0
Proposal total
Phase 1 — Mixer / kettles / HX / controls / engineering / FAT / SAT / freight (lines 1–6, 10–13)$1,015,350
Phase 2 — Bottling tie-in / flavour / CIP (lines 7–9)$454,900
Material escalation reserve + project insurance + bonding+$49,750
Total proposal — consolidated 36-week delivery$1,520,000
Payment milestones (consolidated proposal)
1. With PO — Down payment (20%)$304,000
2. Fabrication start (30%)$456,000
3. Factory Acceptance Test pass (30%)$456,000
4. Site Acceptance Test pass (20%)$304,000
Under the phased option (Step 10): the same 20/30/30/20 schedule applies separately to each phase. Phase 1 ($920K) → $184K / $276K / $276K / $184K. Phase 2 ($480K) → $96K / $144K / $144K / $96K.
Proposal total
$1,520,000
Fixed-price · 36-week consolidated delivery · 20/30/30/20 milestones
Pricing snapshot + assumption-transparent. Each line locks in the cost basis at the moment of proposal-send. If 316L stainless casting prices spike 9% in Q2, the Aurelia commitment holds the Feb pricing. The proposal ships with an assumption schedule (utility tie-ins available, ceiling clearance verified, 480V 3-ph 200A drop in client scope) and three named exclusions (foundation modifications, building-side electrical work, wastewater-side modifications). Anything outside is a change order, written, signed, dated. The phased option lives in the appendix — David's pre-loaded the conversation in case lead-time pushback arrives.
10
Step 10

Phased delivery — the lead-time conversation that saves the deal

The proposal landed at $1.52M / 36 weeks consolidated. Most equipment vendors lose this deal here — Series-B-pace ramps don't tolerate 36-week single-shipment lead-times. Cascade runs a structured phased-delivery conversation — three options walked through line-by-line — and lands a $1.40M PO with Phase 1 commissioning by week 14. This is the manufacturing conversation.

Why this matters →When proposals land with a lead-time objection, the win isn't a discount — it's a structured phased-delivery conversation. Three options, transparent line items, decoupled commits without quality-down.
Draft → Sent → Viewed → ✓ Accepted
Alternate outcomes
✕ Declined ○ Expired
PROP-2026-0341 · event timeline
Feb 6 · 09:20
Proposal created by Linda Pham Draft
Feb 6 · 14:42
Proposal sent to maya.chen@aureliabev.com, carlos.reyes@aureliabev.com · cc Priya Shah Sent
Feb 6 · 15:23
Proposal viewed by Maya Chen · 2nd view by Carlos at 17:48 · 3rd view by Priya at Feb 7 09:11 Viewed
Feb 8 · 11:14
Priya's reply lands. "David — the system spec is right but the 36-week lead-time has me sweating. Series-B runway means we need to be selling more cases in Q4 2026, not still installing equipment. Can we pull anything forward?" — This is the manufacturing conversation.
Feb 9 · 09:30
David + Linda + Greg sit down for a phased-option prep session. Rather than discount $1.52M (which kills margin and signals an inflated number), they prepare three structured options: Option A (consolidated as quoted), Option B (phased), Option C (strip Phase 2). Let Aurelia trade off knowingly.
Feb 13 · 10:00
Phased-delivery review call (90 min) — David, Linda, Maya, Carlos, Priya, Tom on Zoom. Linda walks the three options:

Option A — Consolidated: $1.52M / 36 weeks fab + ~5 weeks ship + SAT + commissioning · Aurelia plant production-ready ~week 41
Option B — Phased: Phase 1 $0.92M / 14 weeks fab (mixer / kettles / HX / controls — FAT pass + release for shipment) → ship + install + SAT + commissioning ≈ +5 wks · Aurelia plant production-ready week 19 · Phase 2 $0.48M / 22 weeks from Phase 1 PO (bottling tie-in / flavour / CIP — phase-2 production-ready ~week 27) · Total $1.40M · saves $120K via decoupled sourcing (Phase 2 mid-volume not premium-rush)
Option C — Phase 1 only: $0.92M / 14 weeks fab → production-ready week 19 · revisit Phase 2 in 2027

Options B + C save Aurelia ~22 weeks of runway vs A. Discussion runs 50 minutes longer than scheduled. Greg drops in for the close.
Feb 18 · 11:30
Revised proposal PROP-2026-0341-r2 sent at $1,400,000 — Option B selected. Phase 1 spec firm + Phase 2 spec firm with separate PO release scheduled 60 days after Phase 1 SAT pass — gives Aurelia a soak window to validate Phase 1 throughput against the SKU-expansion ramp before committing Phase 2 fab capacity. Aurelia replies the same afternoon: "This works. Maya's preparing the cap-ex committee deck — we'll target Phase 1 PO release the week of Mar 9; Phase 2 PO release will fire ~60 days post-SAT (mid-September target)."
Mar 12 · 13:45
PO released + down payment captured at $920,000 Phase 1 (with Phase 2 $480,000 PO Pending) · payment terms 20/30/30/20 milestones. $184,000 down payment captured via wire (20% × $920K Phase 1). Stage flips to ✓ Closed Won · production-release task auto-fires for Mar 23 fab start.
Why the structured phased conversation mattered. When capital-equipment proposals land with a lead-time objection, the wrong move is "we can knock 10% off" — that destroys margin and signals the proposal was inflated. The right move is three transparent options with the customer choosing what to commit. Aurelia kept the Phase 1 spec they cared about (FAT pass at week 14, plant production-ready ~week 19) and decoupled the Phase 2 commit (so the SKU-expansion timeline can firm). $120K cost saving via decoupled sourcing, deal signed, margin intact, relationship strengthened, total contract $1.40M. 30–40% of capital-equipment deals stall on lead-time; vendors that have a structured phased motion close them.
11
Step 11

PO Released — Closed Won 🏆

PO PDF + down payment received together triggers the deal to move to Closed Won. Probability flips to 100%. Sales commission unlocks. Forecast updates. Production starts — but the sales pipeline's job is done. The active capital project moves to the project pipeline (Step 13). Phase 2 stays open as a linked deal in PO Pending — it auto-fires when Phase 1 hits SAT.

Why this matters →Closed Won fires when the PO PDF is countersigned AND the down-payment wire lands — not when commissioning finishes. Revenue is forecastable from this point; fab + FAT + ship + SAT is production management, not sales.
✓ Technical Proposal
✓ Negotiation (Phased)
★ PO Released
Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line
Closed Won — PO Released · Mar 12, 2026
✓ Closed Won
Original consolidated proposal$1,520,000
Phase 1 PO value (won today)$920,000
Phase 2 deal — PO Pending$480,000 (linked)
Total contract value$1,400,000
Phased savings vs consolidated−$120K (decoupled sourcing)
Down payment captured$184,000 (20% × Phase 1)
AEDavid Yoon
AE commission (6% on $1.4M)$84,000 — pro-rata at each phase SAT
App-engineer bump (1.5%)$21,000 — to Linda Pham, same pro-rata trigger
Days RFQ → PO59 days (target was 70)
Phase 1 fab startMar 23, 2026
FAT / SAT / Production releaseJun 17 / Jul 8 / Jul 28 (targets)
$1.40M
Total contract (Phase 1 + 2)
59 d
RFQ → PO
$105K
Total commission ($84K AE + $21K app-eng) — pro-rata at each phase SAT
12
Step 12

Webhooks fire — Slack, Epicor ERP, production scheduler

The instant the deal flips to Won, Interface365 fires deal.won webhooks to every subscribed endpoint. Slack celebrates. Epicor Kinetic ERP creates the sales order + work-order skeleton. The internal MS Project tooling adds Aurelia's fab slots to the production schedule (10 wk fab + 3 wk assembly + 1 wk QC = 14 wk lead).

Why this matters →Outbound webhooks to Slack / Epicor ERP / production scheduler / anything — HMAC-signed, retried, logged in delivery history. Production starts moving the same minute the PO releases.
Webhook payload (POST)
// POST https://api.cascade-erp.local/sales-orders
// X-I365-Signature: sha256=...
{
  "event": "deal.won",
  "timestamp": "2026-03-12T13:45:21Z",
  "data": {
    "deal_id": "d_aurel26p1",
    "name": "Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line",
    "po_value": 920000,
    "total_contract_value": 1400000,
    "down_payment_captured": 184000,
    "payment_terms": "20/30/30/20 (PO/Fab/FAT/SAT)",
    "ae_commission": 84000,
    "app_engineer_bump": 21000,
    "sales_order_number": "SO-26-0341",
    "currency": "USD",
    "lead_time_weeks": 14,
    "source_organization": "Park Process Engineering",
    "account": "Aurelia Beverages",
    "primary_contact": "Maya Chen",
    "ae_user_id": "u_dyoon",
    "app_engineer_id": "u_lpham",
    "fab_start_date": "2026-03-23",
    "fat_target": "2026-06-17",
    "sat_target": "2026-07-08",
    "production_release_target": "2026-07-28",
    "phase_2_linked_deal": "d_aurel26p2",
    "closed_at": "2026-03-12T13:45:21Z"
  }
}
Slack #cascade-wins
#
#cascade-wins
Cascade Industrial Systems · 24 members
Interface365 APP 1:45 PM
🎉 Deal Won — Aurelia Beverages — Phase 1 Mixing Line — $920K.
AE: David Yoon. App engineer: Linda Pham. Down payment $184K captured. Phase 2 PO pending ($480K). Production release Phase 1 → fab start week of Mar 23. FAT scheduled Jun 17. SAT target Jul 8.
Phased delivery saved $120K vs the $1.52M consolidated; total contract $1.40M. Commission unlocks at SAT — $84K to David, $21K to Linda. Greg's coffee on Friday.
HMAC-signed, retried, logged. Every webhook gets an X-I365-Signature: sha256=... header so receivers can verify authenticity. Failed deliveries auto-retry with exponential backoff. The Settings → Webhooks → Delivery logs page shows every fire with status code, response, and retry count.
13
Step 13

In production + the post-commissioning expansion conversation

Capital-equipment deals don't end at "Won" — that's where they really begin. The active project lives in its own 7-stage pipeline (Fab → FAT → Ship → Install → SAT → Commissioning → Live). Auto-tasks fire on each milestone with auto-invoicing for the corresponding payment milestone (30/30/20). And 8 weeks post-commissioning, the inevitable conversation: "Tom is loving the line. Can we add a 4th kettle and integrate ERP-side SKU tracking?" Post-commissioning expansion change orders are where the deepest manufacturing margin lives.

Why this matters →The Project pipeline tracks the active build separately from the sales pipeline. Change orders run through a structured workflow: scope → price → sign → invoice — the difference between "billable change order" and "scope creep eating your margin" is having that motion in CRM, not in email threads.
Aurelia Beverages — Active build (SO-26-0341)
Project · linked to deal · production lead: Linda Pham
Live · Wk 16 (commissioned Jul 28)
Linked dealAurelia — Phase 1 Mixing Line
Fab startMar 23, 2026
Production releaseJul 28, 2026
FAT / SAT statusFAT pass Jun 19 · SAT pass Jul 14
Payments collected$920,000 of $920,000 Phase 1 (100%) — all milestones cleared
Project tierCapital · Series-B customer
Project pipeline (production phases)
✓ Fab
✓ FAT (Jun 19)
✓ Ship (Jun 25)
✓ Install
✓ SAT (Jul 14)
✓ Commissioning
● Live (commissioned Jul 28)
Project tasks (build phase)
Production release — Phase 1 fab start + invoice 30% ($276K, fab-start milestone) Mar 23 · Linda P.
Mixer fab complete — assembly + QC begin Jun 3 · Linda P.
Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) — 3-day at Cascade Jun 17 → Jun 19 · Linda P.
FAT sign-off + invoice 30% ($276K, FAT milestone) Jun 19 · David Y.
Ship Portland → San Diego + rigging Jun 25 → Jul 1 · Linda P.
Site Acceptance Test (SAT) + commissioning Jul 8 → Jul 14 · Linda P.
SAT sign-off + invoice 20% ($184K, final Phase 1 milestone) Jul 14 · David Y.
Production release + operator training Jul 28 · Linda P.
30-day post-commissioning check-in (Tom + Carlos) Aug 25 · David Y.
Phase 2 PO release window (60 days post Phase 1 SAT — soak validation) Sep 14 · David Y.
Project budget tracker
$1.40M
Total contract (Phase 1+2)
$684K
Phase 1 actual cost-of-goods
$920K
Phase 1 invoiced (100%)
Phase 1 closed at 25.7% gross margin · Phase 2 PO target Sep 14 · Phase 2 fab slot reserved week 22
Project signals
Status● Live · running smoothly
Margin (Phase 1 closed)25.7% gross (target 24%)
Customer NPS (post-commissioning)10 / 10 · "Tom is loving the line"
Post-commissioning · change order #1
Aurelia asks for 4th kettle + ERP integration — +$340,000

Sep 17, eight weeks post-commissioning. Maya emails David: "David — Tom is loving the line. We're already capacity-bound at 220K cases/mo and the SKU expansion is firming faster than we modelled. Can we (a) add a 4th 600-gal kettle and (b) integrate the line into our ERP for SKU-level batch tracking? We need a quote — and ideally a fab slot before year-end." David escalates to Linda same day; Linda writes CO-2026-0341-01: add 1× 600-gal kettle +$84,500, sanitary piping + tie-in +$18,200, ERP integration package (Epicor SKU-tracking middleware + Aurelia-side commissioning) +$214,000, commissioning labour +$23,300. Total: +$340,000.

David presents the CO four days later with a clean line-item breakdown + revised payment schedule (50/50 Phase-CO/Commissioning). Maya + Priya sign on Sep 30. $170,000 (50% of CO) captured immediately as supplemental down payment. Total relationship: $1,400,000 → $1,740,000. Phase 2 PO release stays on its original Sep 14 trigger; the CO fabricates in parallel (4th kettle on the same casting cycle as Phase 2 components — schedule synergy of ~3 weeks). Tagged ● Billable change order.

Without the change-order workflow + project record: this would have been a verbal "we can probably help" that David agrees to, Aurelia counts on, the price gets argued months later. Instead: scope priced in 4 days, signed in writing in 2 weeks, supplemental down payment captured, fab slot reserved transparently. Post-commissioning expansion change orders are typically the highest-margin work in capital-equipment relationships — properly captured, they often add 20-30% to top-line revenue at higher-than-base margins because the relationship + technical integration is already paid for.

14
Step 14

Dashboard view — Friday morning, week 30

It's Friday morning, week 30 of the Aurelia project (Oct 23, 2026). Cascade has 6 active capital projects, $7.2M in active project value, and 11 deals in the sales pipeline ($14.4M open, raw). Aurelia's Phase 1 (Live since Jul 28), Phase 2 (PO released Sep 14), and the $340K expansion CO (signed Sep 30) all land on the same dashboard as everyone else's work.

Why this matters →Live KPIs roll the Aurelia relationship up alongside everything else — sales pipeline, project status by phase, stagnant proposals, change-order pipeline, all in one view.
KPIs · This month vs last month
Open sales pipeline (raw, RFQ → PO Pending)
$14.4M
↑ +$2.3M MoM
Won this quarter
$4.8M
↑ +18% vs Q2
Stagnant proposals (14d+)
2
$2.5M at risk
Change-order revenue (YTD)
$890K
↑ 11.4% over base
Sales pipeline · open, raw (RFQ → PO Pending) + active capital projects
RFQ Received (9)
$3.6M
App Engineering (3)
$2.8M
Technical Proposal (4)
$5.4M
Negotiation (2)
$2.1M
PO Pending (1)
$0.5M
Active Capital Projects — incl. Aurelia P1 + P2 + CO (7)
$7.2M
Top closers · this quarter
🏆
David Yoon
Aurelia: P1 won + CO signed + P2 PO released
$1.74M
#2
Linda Pham
App eng on 4 wins
$58K comm-eligible
#3
Mei Tanaka
1 deal won (East region)
$0.9M
#4
Hank Vasquez
2 RFQs in App Eng
$1.2M wt
Upcoming milestones (next 21 days)
Aurelia · Phase 2 fab milestone (30%) $144K · Oct 28
Aurelia · Expansion CO fab milestone (30%) $102K · Nov 4
Sterling Foods · FAT $420K · Nov 9
Veridian · SAT + final invoice $420K · Nov 12
15
Step 15 · the prequel

What Cascade set up before any of this worked

Rewind six weeks before the Aurelia RFQ landed. Every screen you just walked through — the source dropdown on the RFQ form, the buying-committee roles, the 8-stage capital sales pipeline, the 7-phase project pipeline, the equipment catalogue, the change-order template — was configured once by Cascade's office manager (Tina Reyes) in Settings. Then it reused itself through every RFQ that followed.

Why this matters →Everything you saw was configured once before Day 1. Configure once, reuse forever — no per-RFQ setup overhead.
Pipelines & stages (2 pipelines)
Capital Equipment Sales · 8 stages Capital Project · 7 phases
Custom fields (22 across 4 entities)
Lead · 6 Deal · 9 Account · 4 Project · 3
Activity types
RFQ Received Application Sizing Plant Visit Technical Proposal Sent FAT Scheduled SAT Scheduled Production Release Commissioning
Lead statuses
New · RFQ inbound Contacted Qualified Nurture (no fit yet) Disqualified · out of scope
Tags (color-coded)
Series-B Engineer-referred F&B Batch High margin Phased-deal-likely
Sources (RFQ origin)
Engineer / consultant referral Past-customer referral Industry trade show Google / website OEM rep network
Webhooks (3 active endpoints)
Slack #cascade-wins Epicor Kinetic ERP Production scheduler (MS Project)
Roles, teams & permissions
120 users · 8 AEs · 6 app engs 7 roles Territory-scoped deal visibility
One-time setup, lifetime value. Tina spent six weeks configuring all of this (the equipment catalogue with 240 SKUs across 8 product families is the longest part — every item carrying base price, lead-time, sanitary spec flags, and CAD drawing URL). Every RFQ afterward inherits the conventions automatically — phased options, payment milestones, FAT/SAT templates, change orders, all run on the same templates. New AEs onboard in an afternoon because the workspace already speaks their language. And critically: every $ of margin and every commission split shows up in dashboards, not in someone's spreadsheet.

Entity relationship map

How every entity in this walkthrough connects

Lead
converts to→
Contact
+
Source org
+
Deal
Activities
+
Notes
+
Tasks
+
Files
attach to→
Deal
Products
line items in→
Quote
accepted, closes→
Deal Won
creates→
Project
Webhooks
fired by every event→
Slack
Zapier
Custom endpoints

Ready to set this up for your firm?

14-day free trial · No credit card · Manufacturing templates pre-loaded for capital-equipment OEMs, contract manufacturers, and process-equipment vendors.

Start free trial Read the reference guide →
← Back to
Manufacturing guide
Pipeline structure, custom fields, settings — the full setup reference.
Try another industry →
Browse all 12 guides
Real Estate · SaaS · Agency · Construction · Finance · 7 more.